PDA

View Full Version : Seen This?


BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-21-2008, 10:54 PM
I got this in an e-mail today, thought I'd share it with you.....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Note: forwarded message attached.



Subject: Fw: USCG Job Well Done




A pleasure to pass this on. Bob
----- Original Message -----
From:

Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Fw: USCG Job Well Done


Hi Zoomer and all! Congressional recognition well deserved. Passing it on. Thanks. ttyl, :-) Bob, etc.

And I'll bet you your next paycheck that each and every one of these Coasties involved in this rescue would tell you 'I'm only doing my job'...... That's the way ALL our military people are........even the Other Four services. Old Cost Guard, new Coast Guard....the real tradition still holds true....saving lives at sea. Bravo Zulu to 'em all who keep that tradition alive!
Zoomer

ALASKA SENATOR LISA MURKOWSKI LAUDS USCG'S EFFORTS IN THE ALASKA RANGER RESCUE

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD
Senate - March 31, 2008
Page: S2218

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD --

Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, many of my fellow Americans are very aware of the exhilaration but also the dangers and risks of commercial fishing in
Alaska's Bering Sea. The pictures and the stories--and even the sounds--are
brought into our living rooms every week on the Discovery Channel program
``The Deadliest Catch.'' Many have seen it.

When the Bering Sea fishing fleet finds itself in trouble, they rely on the
men and women of the U.S. Coast Guard to truly make order from the chaos.
These stories have not escaped Hollywood's attention. It is not only seen on
``The Deadliest Catch,'' but there was a 2006 feature film, ``The
Guardian,'' starring Kevin Costner and Ashton Kutcher, which paid tribute to
the Coast Guard search and rescue teams based at Air Station Kodiak in
Alaska.
Coast Guard Air Station Kodiak is home to aircrews and rescue swimmers who
endure some of the harshest winds and seas in the world. They put their own
lives on the line every day so that others may live.

The events that were depicted in ``The Guardian'' were fictional, but the
events that transpired this past Easter morning in the Bering Sea were very
real. I rise today to honor the men and women of the U.S. Coast Guard who
participated in efforts to rescue the 47-member crew of the fishing vessel
Alaska Ranger. As a direct result of these heroic efforts, 42 members of the
Ranger's crew survived. There were no Coast Guard lives lost. In the words
of RADM Arthur Brooks, commander of the Seventeenth Coast Guard District, it
was ``one of the greatest search and rescue efforts in modern history.''

Let me kind of paint the scene fo r you. It was 2:52 a.m. local time on
Easter Sunday, March 23, that the Alaska Ranger, a Seattle- based factory
trawler, radioed the Coast Guard Communications Station Kodiak with a
distress call. The vessel at that time was located 120 miles west of Dutch
Harbor at the end of the Aleutian Chain. The vessel was taking on water.
There were 25-knot winds and seas 6 to 8 feet high.

The Coast Guard immediately launched a rescue effort. There was a cutter,
two helicopters, and a C-130. The crew of the Ranger had to abandon ship
before the first Coast Guard asset arrived.

First to arrive on the scene is a Coast Guard Jayhawk Rescue Helicopter,
deployed from St. Paul Island, located about 230 miles to the north of where
the Alaska Ranger was at the time.

The Jayhawk carried a crew of four men. There was no backup.
The Jayhawk arrives on the scene about 5:30 a.m. This is about
2 1/2 hours after the first distress call. This helps put in perspective

the distances with which we are dealing. By this point in time, the Alaska
Ranger has already sunk in the water. The vessel is completely gone. It has
already sunk in water that is more than 6,300 feet deep.

The air crew flies in and looks upon this sea of flashing strobe lights.
Keep in mind, this is 5:30 in the morning. It is still dark.
They have wind and sleet and waves coming up, and they see this sea of
flashing strobe lights, probably a mile end to end.
They are looking down at this scene through the helicopter thinking there is
a light there: Is that a liferaft? Yet another light and another light. Each
light is a member of the Ranger's crew wearing a survival suit. Some are in
liferafts, but others were literally in this human chain stretching almost a
mile in length.
Others are floating alone. The water temperature in the sea is about 32
degrees.

Rescue swimmer O'Brien Hollow is lowered into the water to triage the
survivors. One by one, he positions the survivors to be hoisted into the
h elicopter above. The helicopter is tossing above in these very heavy winds.
Hollow is tethered to the helicopter from above.

We also have then the Coast Guard cutter Munro. It has been diverted from
its position 130 nautical miles south of the incident. It is racing to the
scene at the speed of about 30 knots.

The Munro carries a Dolphin rescue helicopter which lifts off the Munro some
80 miles before the cutter arrives at the scene.

Rescue swimmer Abram Heller is lowered into the water and begins to gather
victims to be hoisted into the basket to be lifted up into the helicopter.
Heller stays in the water to make room on the Dolphin for survivors.

One has to remember, they have some 47 men in the water. They are trying to lift them into the basket and then into the helicopter,
but the helicopter can only accommodate so many people. The rescue swimmer
is saying: I am going to stay down here; move this group to safety.

The Jayhawk then departs the scene for the Munro, but the Jayhawk cannot
land on the cutter's deck because it is too big. So the Jayhawk crew hoists
the survivors down to the Munro's deck one by one. Just as they have been
lifting survivors out of the sea into this helicopter that is pitching
around in the air, they now have to be dropped down to the deck one at a
time in the basket.

In the meantime, a fuel line is sent up from the Munro's deck to refuel the
Jayhawk, and it then departs to the scene.

The Jayhawk recovers Heller, the rescue swimmer who has been down there with
the survivors, and rescues more survivors. In total, the Jayhawk is
responsible for saving
15 lives. The Dolphin saves five lives.

The third player in this supremely heroic effort is a Coast Guard C-130,
which circled over the scene serving as an airborne coordination and
communications platform.

The Coast Guard also received substantial assistance from the Ranger's
sister fishing vessel, the Alaska Warrior. The Alaska Warrior also had been
out on the Alaska fishing grounds. They left their fishing grounds to pick
up 22 survivors from the Ranger who were in liferafts and then returned them
to Dutch Harbor.

Unfortunately, four of the Ranger's crew members could not be saved. One
still remains unaccounted for. The Coast Guard sent the Jayhawk and a C-130
back to the scene with fresh crews to search for the missing mariner but
without success. The search for the missing crew member was suspended on
Tuesday, March 25.

The Coast Guard uses the maritime phrase "Bravo Zulu''
to recognize a job well done, and this was truly a job well done. While the
Coast Guard rigorously trains its people to perform this mission, it is very
rare to undertake a mission of this intensity and this complexity.

Rescue swimmers Hollow and Heller had participated in rescues bef ore but
nothing approaching th is kind of a rescue.
In fact, rescues of this nature are extremely rare. After very carefully
examining the records dating back over 30 years, the Coast Guard could only
find a couple mass rescue cases that were even remotely similar to what we
experienced on Easter.

While dramatic search-and-rescue cases are no stranger to Alaska, most
involve 10 victims or less. Others involve a much more orderly abandonment
of a vessel. This was the case in 1980, when the cruise ship Prinsendam went
down near Yakutat, AK. But large numbers of people abandoning ship directly
into the water hardly ever happens. That is one more reason why this rescue
effort was remarkable.
But it is not the only reason.

The risks that were involved in this case were extreme.
They had, again, darkness, extremely high winds, high seas, ice, freezing
temperatures, extremely long distances from any supporting infrastructure,
and all these conditions present unique hazards to the rescuers.

Success such as this could not occur without the commitment of a great many
people. The crews of the Jayhawk, the Dolphin, and the Munro will long be
remembered for their heroism.

Backing them were the watch standers at Coast Guard Communications Station
Kodiak. These were the folks w ho answered the Alaska Ranger's mayday call.
The C-130 crews, the Kodiak Air Station duty officers, and the District 17
command center controllers in Juneau also contributed. In total, something
on the order of 170 Alaska-based Coast Guard men and women were involved in
this effort.

ADM Thad Allen has already expressed "Bravo Zulu''
to all the men and women involved with this effort. I am honored to take a
few minutes from the Senate's day to praise these men and women of the U.S.
Coast Guard on a job well done. Our Nation is always well served by these
highly trained individuals who stand "always ready.''




CONGRESSIONAL RECORD
Senate - March 31, 2008
Page: S2218


Wray....:cool:

BMCM Stuart S. Slesh
04-22-2008, 11:55 PM
No, this is the first I've heard of it. What do you think the odds are that any of us would have heard of it if you hadn't posted?
We don't advertise enough, even to our own.......

BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-23-2008, 06:50 AM
Stu, it took over 100 views here to get your one post. It appears to me many just don't give a $hit.

Really surprising here since this is an E-7 and above site. Well, then again, maybe it's not.

Wray.. :cool:

BMCS Eric Guerette
04-23-2008, 09:42 AM
Wray,
How do you equate not posting a comment here about this to no giving a crap? Is posting here the only way to show that I care? I would think posting this on the mess deck or reading it at quarters would be a better show of pride, but you can't see that. Thank you for brining it to our attention, but don't assume I don't care because I hadn't posted anything.
Eric

DCCS Brett Wickett
04-23-2008, 01:41 PM
Wray,
thanks for posting this. I have not seen or heard about it. I don't think people not posting a reply says anything that you are eluding to. You posted it for people to read. Over 100 have read it. Sometimes people just read but have nothing to say.

For the record, I have been tossing around the idea of retirement. Then i read an article like this and get a chill and a since of pride. I don't think I am ready to hang it up just yet.

Brett

BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-23-2008, 02:31 PM
Eric,
As I said, it took over 100 views to get one post...Say what you will, Eric, the truth of the matter is "Perception is Reality"....

Wray... :cool:

BMCS Burt Ford
04-23-2008, 03:13 PM
wray i read it in the newspaper here too and did not write a repond to the editor.

BMCS Ian McVicker
04-23-2008, 03:28 PM
Yes, I had seen this, and got a pretty good amount of publicity.

Thanks for posting Wray, but don't why you appear so upset that nobody responded. You posted a story for folks to read, but don't remember there being a requirement to respond. Just when I think you couldn't possibly sound more silly...Oh, well.

Eric, don't get spun up. Believe me, Wray Gillette is not the measuring stick as to what a good E-7 and above is, and it's just his opinion.

SKC Raymond Kurtz
04-23-2008, 03:36 PM
Stu, it took over 100 views here to get your one post. It appears to me many just don't give a $hit.

Really surprising here since this is an E-7 and above site. Well, then again, maybe it's not.

Wray.. :cool:

Okay, so I didn't jump up and down and write in to say YEEEEEE HAAAAAAW, does that mean I don't care? Wow, how negative of you to put down all who read the post and didn't say anything about it.

BTW thanks for posting that article, it was very inspirational and no I too did not see it anywhere else.

I come to this site for articles such as the one you posted, not to be berated for not caring when I had nothing to say about it.

BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-23-2008, 05:10 PM
but don't why you appear so upset that nobody responded. You posted a story for folks to read, but don't remember there being a requirement to respond. Just when I think you couldn't possibly sound more silly...Oh, well.

Ian, we all know there is no requiremment to respond, I guess I just thought more people would... apparently they would rather continue the "Physical Fitness vs MAW" discussion or something else... don't worry, I won't make this mistake again, after all, I wouldn't want to sound "more silly".

BMCS Ian McVicker
04-24-2008, 08:58 AM
Sorry, all out of sugar cookies today.

MSTCS Jerald P. Motyka
04-24-2008, 02:47 PM
Wray, do you know what it takes to put something into the Congressional Record?

An elected Representative has to go up to the podium while Congress is in session and read the script. Please note that "in session" means from the DAY that the Congressional session starts until the DAY that the Congressional session ends... so this COULD have been read to an empty room at 0200 on a Sunday morning... and it is now a permanent part of the Congressional Record.

It's kinda like being introduced by the wrong name... a nice gesture, but it rings hollow.

BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-24-2008, 06:55 PM
Jerald, do not worry... I have had enough shit here.. if I say something negative I get bitched at.. When I post something positive I get bitched at...

Tell ya what, You and Ian can have it, 'cause I certainly don't need this shit.

Go jump on the MAW board.. that seems to be where the interest is...

No need to reply. I wont.

SKC Raymond Kurtz
04-25-2008, 09:22 AM
Wray, you post something very positive, then you get upset that no one says anything about it, even though 100 people read it which clearly means that 100 people are interested in what you posted. So you yourself turn a positive into a negative and then complain because it appears that you are being picked on.

I thought Chief's were supposed to be humble and have thick skins so that nothing bothers them, at least in public.

BMCS Ian McVicker
04-25-2008, 11:10 AM
Jerald, do not worry... I have had enough shit here.. if I say something negative I get bitched at.. When I post something positive I get bitched at...

I thought I was reading one of Bill's posts there for a second. Nobody said anything negative about you posting that story...but as shown below, because none of us responded to you after the fact, you ONCE AGAIN made negative statements concerning E-7 and above which is nothing new. I realize that when you posted this same thread on Mil.com, the folks over there lined up to kiss your backside, but don't get your panties in a bunch when we fail to do the same. I think you opinion of yourself and expectations are just a little to high.

Stu, it took over 100 views here to get your one post. It appears to me many just don't give a $hit.

Really surprising here since this is an E-7 and above site. Well, then again, maybe it's not.

Wray.. :cool:

Eric,
As I said, it took over 100 views to get one post...Say what you will, Eric, the truth of the matter is "Perception is Reality"....

Wray... :cool:

I think what gets me the most about you is when you continually bag on the Active Chiefs, because we don't fit your idea of a "Chief". Well, I know some folks Wray, and know a lot more than you think. If you really want to drag up some of that mud from the bottom, I'll be more than happy to talk about why you trying to project yourself as the "Measuring Stick" for what makes a good "Chief" is a joke.

Days of you spewing that garbage over here are over, and I will continue to call you out. If you want some of that love, go back over to Mil.com, because to tell you the truth, I'm tired of listening to you.

BMCS R. Scott Pugh
04-25-2008, 01:38 PM
I have read and acknowledge the above entry.

R. S. Pugh, BMCS

BMCM Wray Gillette (Ret)
04-25-2008, 05:46 PM
Just to set the record straight....


Wray, you post something very positive, then you get upset that no one says anything about it, even though 100 people read it which clearly means that 100 people are interested in what you posted.

No Raymond, that means 100 people looked at it and choose not to comment on it. They had no idea what the thread was about.


I think what gets me the most about you is when you continually bag on the Active Chiefs, because we don't fit your idea of a "Chief".

Ian, please re-read my comments and feel free to quote me where I said anything about the "active duty" Chief's... Bill Wells was right... "Why don't Coasties read..." (actually it is the reading comprehension that is a problem....) Anyhow, he must have really gotten to you to make you resign your membership here, only to re-register a few months later....

I think you opinion of yourself and expectations are just a little to high.

Oh really.....well, hate to tell you this, but...I really don't care what you think...


Enjoy the rest of your day....... I will ;)

Wray.. :cool:

BMCS Ian McVicker
04-26-2008, 09:41 AM
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

BMCM Stuart S. Slesh
04-26-2008, 02:07 PM
No Raymond, that means 100 people looked at it and choose not to comment on it. They had no idea what the thread was about.

Wray, you're a professional victim. Not everyone who read the thread has the ability to comment on it. Those they do made the choice not to. You made the choice to equate that with them not caring. They responded to your negative comments.......... and again, you're the victim. Everyone is against Wray. And true to form, you slam on anyone who disagrees with you, you slam on the site, you slam on a thread that people actually want to discuss,....... and shock of shocks....you once again tell everyone that you're taking your ball and going home.
You started a thread talking about the accomplishments of the Coast Guard and turned it into what?
Use that reading comprehension and see if you can determine where this thread went south.

And Wray, take a vote........ you do care what Ian thinks about you. You must, you responded to him. And you didn't defend yourself, you attacked him.

For the record, people haven't attacked you when you posted something positive. Their negative comments about you always follow your negative comments,..... and you can check on that. Find anywhere you think someone attacked you, and read a couple of posts back.

BMC Russell Miller
04-26-2008, 08:46 PM
Master Chief,
The day you posted it, I printed a copy, passed it QTRS and posted on the board for our quest to read, it was also read it to a group of students, parents and teacher that came down for a field trip. Several of the students parents are Coast Guard Members as well. Just because no one posted or responded does mean they do not care. To make such a bold statement as that, well it just wrong.

BMCS Burt Ford
04-27-2008, 08:30 PM
Like I said, I read the paper everyday and don't comment on it to the editor. Wray thats a bold statement that 100 people looked at it no one had an idea what it was about. Can you please explain how in the heck you would come to that idea? And for your bonus task, what am I thinking now? I myself have posted stuff here no one commented on but I dont get upset.